MC-250055Warden Doesn't Care to Attack a Mob Attacking it and Will Prioritize a Mob That Triggered it First and is Out of Reach
The warden doesn't care about a mob attacking it if it focused on another mob, even if it is out of reach. This could be cheese of the warden as it could aggro on a zombie or any mob out of reach and a simple iron golem will kill it without fighting back. I had tested this on the player and it seems like it will only switch to the player if the player hits it while attacking another mob, otherwise any mob like an iron golem or zoglin could kill it while it is focused on that out of reach zombie.
Linked Issues
Low
Created Issue:
Warden Doesn't Care to Attack a Mob Attacking it and Will Prioritize a Mob That Triggered it First and is Out of Reach
The warden doesn't care about a mob attacking it if it focused on another mob, even if it is out of reach. This could be cheese of the warden as it could aggro on a zombie or any mob out of reach and a simple iron golem will kill it without fighting back. I had tested this on the player and it seems like it will only switch to the player if the player hits it while attacking another mob, otherwise any mob like an iron golem or zoglin could kill it while it is focused on that out of reach zombie.
Attachments3
![[Mod] Les3awe](../../../data/avatars/users/79847.png){kind=small}
Thank you for your report!
We're tracking this issue in
MC-249885, so this ticket is being resolved and linked as a duplicate.That ticket has already been resolved as working as intended, which means this is not considered a bug and won't be fixed. Please do not leave a comment on the linked ticket.
If you haven't already, you might like to make use of the search feature to see if the issue has already been mentioned.
Quick Links:
📓 Bug Tracker Guidelines – 💬 Community Support – 📧 Mojang Support
📓 Project Summary – ✍️ Feedback and Suggestions – 📖 Game Wiki
I was mentioning that the mob was specifically out of reach
You also said that the mob triggered the warden first, which is mentioned by
MC-249885.I re-did my report to get what I was saying in report
MC-250057I believe this is either a duplicate of MC-12689 or
MC-249885as mentioned above already.