MC-94011Changing Angry tag of aggressive wolves is not working
Hurt wolf
Trying to set the Angry tag of wolves you hit to 0b does not have any effect.
Joined wolf
There seems to a difference between a wolf that was directly hurt by the player and one that joined the attack (see also MC-94010).
When setting the Angry tag of joined wolves to 0b their texture changes to a peaceful one, however they are still attacking the player.
Created Issue:
Changing Angry tag of aggressive wolves is not working
Relates to:
Hurt wolf
Trying to set the Angry tag of wolves you hit to 0b does not have any effect.
Joined wolf
There seems to a difference between a wolf that was directly hurt by the player and one that joined the attack (see also
MC-94010).
When setting the Angry tag of joined wolves to 0b their texture changes to a peaceful one, however they are still attacking the player.
![[Mod] redstonehelper](../../../data/avatars/users/10122.svg){kind=small}
Relates to:
Hurt wolfTrying to set the Angry tag of wolves you hit to 0b does not have any effect.
Joined wolf
There seems to a difference between a wolf that was directly hurt by the player and one that joined the attack (see also
MC-94010).
When setting the Angry tag of joined wolves to 0b their texture changes to a peaceful one, however they are still attacking the player.Hurt wolf
Trying to set the Angry tag of wolves you hit to 0b does not have any effect.
Joined wolf
There seems to a difference between a wolf that was directly hurt by the player and one that joined the attack (see also
MC-94010).
When setting the Angry tag of joined wolves to 0b their texture changes to a peaceful one, however they are still attacking the player.
A comment with security level 'global-moderators' was removed.
WAI per Jeb's comment on
MC-33558:However then for joined wolves the texture should not change
WAI per
MC-66115?Searge's comment onI would prefer a personal statement on that.MC-66115can in my opinion not be taken as evidence for anything, else you could close at least 100 reports (estimated number).Sorry, no.
Isn't it still inconsistent and valid because of that?
Is it also inconsistent if you don't use /entitydata?
Well ok then close it because you have to use the /entitydata command...