"intended" can you elaborate? It is in my, and many players opinion, hindering gameplay. Does intended mean it is a gameplay decision, or does it mean it is currently programmed this way and there is no time/plans to improve this?
I'm pretty sure everyone who was used working with lava has run into problems with this, because I believe it used to update a lot better in (much) older versions, back in the day, so to speak.
I would like to know if this is possibly going to get improved, or not.
Lava does go away eventually, but extremely slow, like hours/days, before it all fell to the ground. but on my post I also got the "intended" reply, wich makes no sense whatsoever.
pci
MC-9544
"intended" can you elaborate? It is in my, and many players opinion, hindering gameplay. Does intended mean it is a gameplay decision, or does it mean it is currently programmed this way and there is no time/plans to improve this?
I'm pretty sure everyone who was used working with lava has run into problems with this, because I believe it used to update a lot better in (much) older versions, back in the day, so to speak.
I would like to know if this is possibly going to get improved, or not.
I feel 'intended' is wrong, but at your advice i've responded in the 'suggestions' part of the forums.
As the previous poster mentions, lava goes away slower, sure, that is fine, but it should be seconds slower, not hours or even days.
Xavier, then how are we supposed to make lava waterfalls that you can turn on and off?
Please stop saying "intended" also.
Well seemingly not always.. at the server where I play this happens:
https://mojang.atlassian.net/browse/MC-9544
Lava does go away eventually, but extremely slow, like hours/days, before it all fell to the ground. but on my post I also got the "intended" reply, wich makes no sense whatsoever.