Lava substitutes water instead of changing it to obsidian when poured down to a water source block trapped in a 1*1*1 block space
Put water into a 1*1*1 block (in other words, water cannot flow out of the source block), and then put lava within the same block. The water block changes into lava block instead of obsidian.
Linked Issues
Created Issue:
Lava substitutes water instead of changing it to obsidian when poured down to a water source block trapped in a 1*1*1 block space
Put water into a 1*1*1 block (which means water cannot flow out of the source block), and then place lava in the same block. The water block changes into lava block instead of obsidian.
Put water into a 1*1*1 block (
which meanswater cannot flow out of the source block), and then place lava in the same block. The water block changes into lava block instead of obsidian.Put water into a 1*1*1 block (in other words, water cannot flow out of the source block), and then place lava within the same block. The water block changes into lava block instead of obsidian.
Put water into a 1*1*1 block (in other words, water cannot flow out of the source block), and then p
lacelava within the same block. The water block changes into lava block instead of obsidian.Put water into a 1*1*1 block (in other words, water cannot flow out of the source block), and then put lava within the same block. The water block changes into lava block instead of obsidian.
duplicates
Sorry for creating a duplicate. But so far I don't understand why is it intended? Shouldn't water/lava become obsidian all the time when lava/water is directly poured onto it? Why is it not happening when water/lava is a single source block? In my opinion there's no reasonable account for it.
I also reported this issue in MC-129434 and MC-129543. They were resolved as duplicates of MC-8930, that didn't annoy me. What actually annoyed me was that MC-8930 had been resolved as working as intended. I really can't understand why the thing works so. From any sense this doesn't follow the basic rule of reaction of contacted water and lava. I have been exclaiming my discontent and asking about the reason of the resolution all the time, but not a single person has replied me. I don't how why's that so. This is obviously a bug and once again, I really don't understand why MC-8930 was resolved as intended.
Look at MC-8930. Lava/water placed onto a single water/lava source block substitutes the water/lava source block instead of changing it into obsidian. Is this reasonable? It violates the basic rule of how water and lava should react when in contact. Should MC-8930 be resolved as WAI?
I've been questioning this all the time under MC-8930 and both my duplicates (MC-129434 and MC-129543), but none of you has responded. Usually when I have an unreasonable explanation you would rush to correct me, but no one has pointed out where I'm wrong about this particular issue, and you don't reopen MC-8930 either. I don't know why's that so.
Hope that you can carefully consider this again. Thank you!
Sorry for creating a duplicate. But so far I don't understand why is it intended? Shouldn't water/lava become obsidian all the time when lava/water is directly poured onto it? Why is it not happening when water/lava is a single source block? In my opinion there's no reasonable account for it.
Please stop update the affect versions list for resolved ticket.
Please don't continue to update the affect versions list of this ticket.