With the /give Command we can get only oak,acacia and mangrove saplings, woods,log and planks but not the rest
give command doesn't give everything
Linked Issues
is duplicated by1
Created Issue:
give command doesn't give everything
With the /give Command we can get only oak,acacia and mangrove saplings, woods and planks but not the rest
givecommanddoesn't give everythingWith the /give Command we can get only oak,acacia and mangrove saplings, woods and planks but not the rest
With the /giveCommandwe can get only oak,acacia and mangrove saplings, woods andplanks but not the restgive command doesn't give everything planks but not the rest
give command doesn't give everything
planks but not the restgive command doesn't give everything
With the /give Command we can get only oak,acacia and mangrove saplings, woods,logd and planks but not the rest
With the /give Command we can get only oak,acacia and mangrove saplings, woods,logdand planks but not the rest
is duplicated by
Thank you for your report!
We're tracking this issue in MCPE-166584, so this ticket is being resolved and linked as a duplicate.
If you would like to add a vote and any extra information to the main ticket it would be appreciated.
If you haven't already, you might like to make use of the search feature to see if the issue has already been mentioned.
Quick Links:
📓 Bug Tracker Guidelines – 💬 Community Support – 📧 Mojang Support
📓 Project Summary – ✍️ Feedback and Suggestions – 📖 BDS Wiki – 📖 FAQs
– I am a bot. This action was performed automatically! The ticket was resolved by one of our moderators, and I left this message to give more information to you.




Can you show any media of the issue when pasting the command in chat? Are you using the command like this: /give @s (and here you should have options of items to choose from)?
you need to specify [data: int] to get these items
DI i try but its not working
data:int does work in 1.19.70.21.
For example, "/give @s wood 64 2" gives you a birch wood
I believe the developers plan to update /give command, But the bug described in this issue does not exist.
This should be marked as "Fixed", "Works As Intended", or "Invalid", because this is supposed to work with the data values, it's not a bug, and also some of this blocks have been already split on the newest versions.