Parity: Bedrock doesn't have "/spreadplayers ... under"
Updated by [Mod] EVGENSYPERPRO
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.
https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... under
Observed results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.
Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.
Created Issue:
Parity: /spreadplayers doesn't have "maxHeight" argument
/spreadplayers "maxHeight" argument was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.
Parity:/spreadplayersdoesn't have "maxHeight" argumentParity: Bedrock doesn't have "/spreadplayers ... under"
/spreadplayers
"maxHeight" argumentwas added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock."/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... under
Observed results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... under
Observed results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... under
Observed results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... under
Observed results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... underObserved results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.
@ๅๅใๅ ฅๅใใฆใกใณใทใงใณ...
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... underObserved results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.
@ๅๅใๅ ฅๅใใฆใกใณใทใงใณ...
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... underObserved results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.
Updated by @EVGENSYPERPRO
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... underObserved results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.
Updated by @EVGENSYPERPRO
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... underObserved results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.Updated by @[Helper] EVGENSYPERPRO
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... underObserved results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.
Updated by
@[Helper] EVGENSYPERPROSummary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... underObserved results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.Updated by [Mod] EVGENSYPERPRO
Summary:
"/spreadplayers ... under" was added in Java 1.16, but not in Bedrock.https://www.minecraft.net/article/nether-update-java
Added an optional argument to specify maximum height. New syntax: spreadplayers <center> [under ]
Steps to reproduce:
- Enter a world with cheats on
- Go to chat
- Type:
/spreadplayers ... underObserved results:
There is no /spreadplayers ... under in Bedrock.Expected results:
It should be there in Bedrock as Java has it in Java Edition 1.16.

Thank you for your report!
However, this issue has been temporarily closed as Awaiting Response.
I do not see a maxHeight argument for this command in Java Edition. Could you please provide a screenshot?
This ticket will automatically reopen when you reply.
Quick Links:
๐ Issue Guidelines – ๐ฌ Mojang Support – ๐ Project Summary – ๐ง Suggestions – ๐ Minecraft Wiki
oh i was a little wrong
Unfortunately, due to the command systems being used differ between platforms, parity issues concerning commands aren't considered valid, and are thus deemed "feature requests" instead.
MC-262950MC-236575Thank you for your report!
However, this issue is Invalid.
Commands in general are not at parity at the moment, and the differences are being worked on one step at a time. New additions made to a command, even if it's an existing one, count as feature requests.
Quick Links:
๐ Bug Tracker Guidelines – ๐ฌ Community Support – ๐ง Mojang Support (Technical Issues) – ๐ง Microsoft Support (Account Issues)
๐ Project Summary – โ๏ธ Feedback and Suggestions – ๐ Game Wiki
[Mod] LateLag This assertion is incorrect. Applying that reasoning would also render MCPE-157696 invalid. While bug reports solely concerning the addition of new commands may not be considered valid, the inclusion of a new parameter within an existing command certainly constitutes a valid parity issue. Additionally, MCPE-166214, MCPE-165278, and
MCPE-172467are also deemed valid.