Gerottinho
- gerottinho
- gerottinho
- America/Sao_Paulo
- Yes
- No
MC-204
Furnace / Dispenser drop
http://i.imgur.com/e3WzV.png
http://i.imgur.com/LtsP5.pngHopper drop (Fancy graphic)
http://i.imgur.com/Jf2zR.pngCrash in minecraft (by locked chest, id 95)
http://i.imgur.com/14lnU.pngDispenser texture block
http://i.imgur.com/5v7br.pngCauldron texture block
http://i.imgur.com/9EM3T.png
Furnace / Dispenser drop
http://i.imgur.com/e3WzV.png
http://i.imgur.com/LtsP5.pngHopper drop (Fancy graphic)
http://i.imgur.com/Jf2zR.pngCrash in minecraft (by locked chest, id 95)
http://i.imgur.com/14lnU.pngDispenser texture block
http://i.imgur.com/5v7br.pngCauldron texture block
http://i.imgur.com/9EM3T.pngDoor particle
http://i.imgur.com/a613G.pngWrong side of the door
http://i.imgur.com/XoQBd.pngFireball texture
http://i.imgur.com/tvARj.png
Sorry my bad spelling, I do not know much English.
— --- —
The bug started when I saw that typing /give Gerottinho 95 (locked chest) crash the game. (On 13w02a.)
After that, I can not create maps. Appears Out of memory or crash.
I thought that only happened in 13w02, and then went back to 1.4.6.
Only now something very strange happened.
When I tried to create the map, after a while, appeared Out of memory, and the screen went white increasing very fast and i closed the game very fast.
I know it could also be the popular "Not Responding" of Windows 7, but was totally white.About files of the crash, they were not saved in the folder .Minecraft (bug?)
-----
Update------New attachment, which I found on Minecraft.
It's about the "Out of memory".
I try do "/testfor Gerotiinho[ [r=10] ]" but doesn't works.
Dont work if you try do "[ [r=10] ]".
Offline mode dont restrict the use of skinsOffline mode does not restrict the use of skins
Please read everything.
I know this is probably not a bug, but I'm tired of the way they enjoy this bug.
All, if entering a server with offline mode, can use the name of any User and thus the skin too.
In Brazil, this happens a lot, theyleave"offline mode" and put a password method inside the server.
Since when bought minecraft, I could no longer play on these servers, my account is used in all these servers because they want the skin.The offline mode should disable the skin of those who use pirated minecraft.
PLEASE do something about it, I want to play in peace in my favorite servers.
Please read everything.
I know this is probably not a bug, but I'm tired of the way they enjoy this bug.
All, if entering a server with offline mode, can use the name of any User and thus the skin too.
In Brazil, this happens a lot, they put "offline mode" and put a password method inside the server.
Since when bought minecraft, I could no longer play on these servers, my account is used in all these servers because they want the skin.The offline mode should disable the skin of those who use pirated minecraft.
PLEASE do something about it, I want to play in peace in my favorite servers.
(Tested on multiplayer only)
Please seeattachment.
To reproduce you will need to press F5.Notable things:
-The head is not appearing for myself
-Entity (includes "block-entity" like chests, signs, and itemframes) will appear on wrong places, depending of the entity (for example if it is a chest or sign) it will disappear and reappear sometimes
-Other players also noticed this problem, but they don't need to press F5
-Inventory disappears or change position(soon more screenshots and video)(Soon posting more information, screenshots, and video)
(Tested on multiplayer only)
Please see this video (http://youtu.be/hcOMmZRxNTk) and attachments.
To reproduce you will need to press F5.Notable things:
-The head is not appearing for myself
-Entity (includes "block-entity" like chests, signs, and itemframes) will appear on wrong places, depending of the entity (for example if it is a chest or sign) it will disappear and reappear sometimes
-Other players also noticed this problem, but they don't need to press F5
-Inventory disappears or change position
Lastest snapshots are using all my CPU and its even making things slow.
For example, water will update slowly, taking like 20s to spread completely.
Slimes will take like 10s to jump and hit the ground again.In the attachments you can see in the
first imagethe snapshotCPU usage, and in the second image you can see thenormal/1.7.4CPU usage.Lastest snapshots are using all my CPU and its even making things slow.
For example, water will update slowly, taking like 20s to spread completely.
Slimes will take like 10s to jump and hit the ground again.In the attachments you can see in the 1st image you can see the normal/1.7.4 CPU usage, and in the second image you can see the snapshot CPU usage.
Lastest snapshots are using all my CPU and
its even making things slow.
For example, water will update slowly, taking like 20s to spread completely.
Slimes will take like 10s to jump and hit the ground again.In the attachments you can see in the 1st image you can see the normal/1.7.4 CPU usage, and in the second image you can see the snapshot CPU usage.
Lastest snapshots are using all my CPU and everything is slow.
For example, water will update slowly, taking like 20s to spread completely.
Slimes will take like 10s to jump and hit the ground again.In the attachments you can see in the 1st image you can see the normal/1.7.4 CPU usage, and in the second image you can see the snapshot CPU usage.
An error in chunks after creating a superflat world.
Seed: 2424695889106062807
Superflat code: 2;7,20x1,5x3,2;3;biome_1
I used the option to re-create the world, but did not appear when Iused this option.(Sorry, I translated using Google Translator.)
An error in chunks after creating a superflat world.
Seed: 2424695889106062807
Superflat code: 2;7,20x1,5x3,2;3;biome_1
I used the option to re-create the world, but the glitch did not appear when I did so.
Gerottinho probably because this report here contained the cause for this bug. It happens sometimes that Mods close older reports because they contained less information
File of the "out of memory" that I mentioned in 1.4.6.
I changed to 1.4.7, but the problem continues.
That was not solved to me.
About the last comment, I see about it and it seems that it was this.
It does not a modded client.
Its a pirate client (all the players can play minecraft FREE, F-R-E-E).
http://i.imgur.com/kgGaOFv.png
84% of the servers in brazil have online mode OFF.
And theses players are using my account in theses servers with offline mode / online mode OFF.
Exemple of this thing, you can show images.
Confirmed to... 1.2.5. (I found this bug in the past, it was so funny)
ã, Ã, õ and Õ have problems too, those characters are used in the portuguese language.
Please correct it!
Happened to me in 1.7.2
BIG log: http://notepad.cc/share/nDsAYj0YuW
http://i.imgur.com/dA9juHG.png
50% resolved
@Markku
I mean 50%, because i'm saying only about the symbols reported in this page.
I don't quoted another symbols.
@Grum
If we are asking for fix for this, its because we don't want unicode font, I think? :\
In my computer, everything related to block updates are laggy. A water for example, takes 30s to spread, a tnt will display the animation normally, then will disappear and 30s later will explode (particle effect and deleting blocks)
This is the worst lag, IMPOSSIBLE to play.
Please don't do that mojang D:
Thanks for warning. This is not a dupe of
MC-67866but onlyMC-63896because my problem is not about mobs but general.Also happens to me. I uploaded an image of this problem on snapshot 14w34c with task manager.
Not happening anymore on Pre-release, fixed. (But still 5%/10% higher than normal/1.7.X)
Somehow returned to me and this time keeps causing lagspikes. http://i.imgur.com/6qM8Nuo.png
@violine1101, also from http://blog.ammaraskar.com/minecraft-vulnerability-advisory/
"Update 3: This problem has been patched as of minecraft version 1.8.4
https://mojang.com/2015/04/minecraft-1-8-4-security-release/
I’m happy to see that multiple other security issues have also been fixed. Once again, I feel better communication would have easily alleviated this problem. Keeping me in the loop and not ignoring me, in addition to proper testing would have easily led to this exploit being fixed long ago."
I love how my report on
MC-204is older than this one but still got closed for the reason "duplicated". I'm actually quite surprised I accessed randomlyMC-204and saw I was the reporter, too.Yes, it still is as seen here on the latest snapshot: http://i.imgur.com/MXRBN8k.png
I don't believe the creator of the issue report will update the issue. What will be done?