MC-267538Putting placeable blocks inside decorated pots also places them
I placed decorated pot and took iron block in hand, in singleplayer flat world. Then just clicked on it. One block placed and second put in pot. Works in survival too, just requires 2 items in hand. Same with others blocks. Can see bug even in newly created world
Linked Issues
![[Mod] Jiingy](../../../data/avatars/users/91802.png){kind=small}
Created Issue:
Putting block in decorated pot places it
I placed decorated pot and took iron block in hand, in singleplayer flat world. Then just clicked on it. Works in survival too, just requires 2 items in hand. Same with others blocks. Can see bug even in newly created world
Environment
ubuntu 22.04, java 17.0.8
Attachments2
I placed decorated pot and took iron block in hand, in singleplayer flat world. Then just clicked on it. One block placed and second put in pot. Works in survival too, just requires 2 items in hand. Same with others blocks. Can see bug even in newly created world
![[Mod] turbo](../../../data/avatars/users/92867.png){kind=small}
ubuntu 22.04, java 17.0.8
![[Mod] Avoma](../../../data/avatars/users/86198.png){kind=small}
Putting block in decorated pot placesitPutting placeable blocks inside decorated pots also places them
![[Mod] ampolive](../../../data/avatars/users/18949.svg){kind=small}
![[Mojang] Panda](../../../data/avatars/users/41658.png){kind=small}
Important![[MCQA] v-magwar](../../../data/avatars/users/18935.svg){kind=small}
![[Mojang] MNilsson](../../../data/avatars/users/18951.svg){kind=small}
Sneaking does that, it prevents aimed-at-block interaction allowing you to place next to containers.
Don't sneak and you'll (try to) put the block in the pot instead. I cannot reproduce both actions taking place at once (in 1.20.4).
I wasn't sneaking
Can confirm. For whatever reason, placing blocks is not disabled when interacting with decorated pots.
2023-12-24_18-56-43.mp4
Can also confirm. @Dhranios, this is occurring in 1.20.5 snapshots, not 1.20.4. This is likely due to some of the changes surrounding interactions in that snapshot (see
MC-267456)I saw the affected versions, hence why my comment explicitly states the version number.