Parity issue: Eyeblossoms do not accept bone meal
The bug
When right clicking on eyeblossoms in Bedrock Edition, more of them will be generated around the one clicked. However, this does not happen in Java Edition.
How to reproduce
- Get bone meal
- Right click on an eyeblossom
Expected results
Bone meal would be consumed and more flowers would be generated.
Actual results
Nothing happens.
Linked Issues
is duplicated by1
Created Issue:
Parity issue: Eyeblossoms do not accept bone meal
The bug
When right clicking on eyeblossoms in Bedrock Edition, more of them will be generated around the one clicked. However, this does not happen in Java Edition.
How to reproduce
- Get bone meal
- Right click on an eyeblossom
Expected results
Bone meal would be consumed and more flowers would be generated.
Actual results
Nothing happens.
is duplicated by
Thank you for your report!
We're resolving and linking this ticket forward as a duplicate of MC-277938, as that ticket contains more detailed information and/or has already been triaged by Mojang.
If you would like to add a vote and any extra information to the main ticket it would be appreciated.
Quick Links:
📓 Bug Tracker Guidelines – 💬 Community Support – 📧 Mojang Support (Technical Issues) – 📧 Microsoft Support (Account Issues)
📓 Project Summary – ✍️ Feedback and Suggestions – 📖 Game Wiki

Can confirm
Thank you for your report!
After consideration, the issue is being closed as Invalid.
This report does not describe a bug.
Quick Links:
📓 Bug Tracker Guidelines – 💬 Community Support – 📧 Mojang Support (Technical Issues) – 📧 Microsoft Support (Account Issues)
📓 Project Summary – ✍️ Feedback and Suggestions – 📖 Game Wiki
It describes a parity issue though, which to my understanding is valid. What exactly makes this one an exception?
It might be because bonemealing any one block tall flower in Bedrock spreads more of it, including eyeblossoms. However, this does not happen in Java for any flower, so eyeblossoms should not have a unique case, according to Mojang (as far as I can tell).
As usual, parity issues are treated inconsistently. I don't disagree with the Invalid resolution itself, as this is a design change that would affect more than just eyeblossoms, but recently a few parity issues were considered valid and fixed despite being either older than Buzzy Bees or affecting more than a recent mob, and both being borderline feature request (talking about
MC-269814andMC-215332).