Forever Master
- ForeverMaster0
- forevermaster0
- Europe/Stockholm
- Yes
- No
MC-89826
![[Mojang] Searge (Michael Stoyke)](../../../data/assets/gravatar/searge.png){kind=small}
![[Mojang] Grum (Erik Broes)](../../../data/assets/gravatar/grum.png){kind=small}
At the moment, Shulkers don't drop anything, not even experience orbs.
This is unexpected for a hostile mob.
Shulkers Don't Drop Experiencef
At the moment, Shulkers don't drop anything, not even experience orbs.
This is unexpected for a hostile mob.
Ideally, Shulkers would drop 10 experience when killed by the player.
The new Elytra/Wings can become too expensive too repair.
This is most likely unintentional since Elytra are meant to be reusable indefinitely.
Potentials ways I can think of to fix this is are:A: Prevent the repair cost of Elytra from going up.
B: Make Elytra repairable through crafting with leather. Each piece of leather restores the Elytra's durability by 25% of its max.
Anyway, please get this issue fixed. Otherwise, a pair of Elytra will eventually become completely useless, and that won't be fun.
Minecraft: Survival/Adventure Mode
The new Elytra/Wings can become too expensive too repair at anvils.
This is most likely unintentional since Elytra are meant to be reusable indefinitely.
Potentials ways I can think of to fix this is are:A: Prevent the repair cost of Elytra from going up.
B: Make Elytra repairable through crafting with leather. Each piece of leather restores the Elytra's durability by 25% of its max.
Anyway, please get this issue fixed. Otherwise, a pair of Elytra will eventually become completely useless, and that won't be fun.
The new Elytra/Wings can become too expensive too repair at anvils.
This is most likely unintentional since Elytra are meant to be reusable indefinitely.
Potentials ways I can think of to fix this is are:A: Prevent the repair cost of Elytra from going up.
B: Make Elytra repairable through crafting with leather. Each piece of leather restores the Elytra's durability by 25% of its max.
Anyway, please get this issue fixed. Otherwise, a pair of Elytra will eventually become completely useless, and that won't be fun.
The new Elytra/Wings can become too expensive too repair at anvils.
This is most likely unintentional since Elytra are meant to be reusable indefinitely.
Potentials ways I can think of to fix this is are:
- A: Prevent the repair cost of Elytra from going up.
- B: Make Elytra repairable through crafting with leather. Each piece of leather restores the Elytra's durability by 25% of its max.
Anyway, please get this issue fixed. Otherwise, a pair of Elytra will eventually become completely useless, and that won't be fun.
The new Elytra/Wings can become too expensive too repair at anvils.
This is most likely unintentional since Elytra are meant to be reusable indefinitely.
Potentials ways I can think of to fix this is are:
- A: Prevent the repair cost of Elytra from going up.
- B: Make Elytra repairable through crafting with leather. Each piece of leather restores the Elytra's durability by 25% of its max.
Anyway, please get this issue fixed. Otherwise, a pair of Elytra will eventually become completely useless, and that won't be fun. ;l
Elytra can Become "Too Expensive" to Repair at Anvils
The new Elytra/Wings can become too expensive too repair at anvils.
This is most likely unintentional since Elytra are meant to be reusable indefinitely.
Once Elytra aren't possible to repair at an anvil, the player will have to load new chunks to find an End Ship for a fresh new pair of Elytra.
Potentials ways I can think of to fix this is are:
- A: Prevent the repair cost of Elytra from going up.
- B: Make Elytra repairable through crafting with leather. Each piece of leather restores the Elytra's durability by 25% of its max.
Anyway, please get this issue fixed. Otherwise, a pair of Elytra will eventually become completely useless, and that won't be fun. ;l
Basically, end stone bricks are much less durable than end stone which doesn't make sense, knowing that stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone and nether bricks being stronger than netherrack.
Bricks are supposed to be more sturdy, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts.The blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be ≥ to end stone. They shouldn't as weak as sandstone.
Basically, end stone bricks are much less durable than end stone which doesn't make sense, knowing that stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone and nether bricksbeingstronger than netherrack.
Bricks aresupposed to bemoresturdy, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts.T
heblast resistance and hardness of end stone bricksshould be ≥ to end stone. They shouldn't as weak as sandstone.Basically, End stone "bricks" are much less durable than raw End stone.
This does not make logical sense. Stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone, and nether bricks are stronger than netherrack.
Any brick-type material is supposed to be sturdier, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts. It's a law of architecture: bricks are one of the most sturdy building materials.To fit logistics, I suggest making blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks the same as regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
To me, End bricks being less resilient and hard than End stone makes no sense. And how would making them have the same properties as End stone affect battling the Ender Dragon?
Basically, End stone "bricks" are much less durable than raw End stone.
This does not make logical sense. Stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone, and nether bricks are stronger than netherrack.
Any brick-type material is supposed to be sturdier, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts. It's a law of architecture: bricks are one of the most sturdy building materials.To fit logistics, I suggest making blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks the same as regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
Basically, End stone "bricks" are much less durable than raw End stone.
This does not make logical sense. Stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone, and nether bricks are stronger than netherrack.
Any brick-type material is supposed to be sturdier, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts. It's a law of architecture: bricks are one of the most sturdy building materials.To fit logistics, I suggest making blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks the same as regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
Basically, End stone "bricks" are much less durable than raw End stone.
This does not make logical sense. Stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone, and nether bricks are stronger than netherrack.
Any brick-type material is supposed to be sturdier, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts. It's a law of architecture: bricks are one of the most sturdy building materials.To fit logistics, I suggest making blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks the same as regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
Basically, End stone "bricks" are much less durable than raw End stone.
This does not make logical sense. Stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone, and nether bricks are stronger than netherrack.
Any brick-type material is supposed to be sturdier, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts. It's a law of architecture: bricks are one of the most sturdy building materials.To fit logistics, I suggest making blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks the same as regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
Basically, End stone "bricks" are much less durable than raw End stone.
This does not make logical sense. Stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone, and nether bricks are stronger than netherrack.
Any brick-type material is supposed to be sturdier, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts. It's a law of architecture: bricks are one of the most sturdy building materials.To fit logistics, I suggest making blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks the same as regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
Basically, End stone "bricks" are much less durable than raw End stone.
This does not make logical sense. Stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone, and nether bricks are stronger than netherrack.
Any brick-type material is supposed to be sturdier, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts. It's a law of architecture: bricks are one of the most sturdy building materials.To fit logistics,
I suggest makingblast resistance and hardness of end stone bricksthe same asregular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
Basically, End stone "bricks" are much less durable than raw End stone.
This does not make logical sense. Stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone, and nether bricks are stronger than netherrack.
Any brick-type material is supposed to be sturdier, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts. It's a law of architecture: bricks are one of the most sturdy building materials.To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
End Stone Bricks aremore frail thanEnd StoneEnd Stone "Bricks" are Less Sturdy than "Raw" End Stone
End Stone"Bricks"are Less Sturdy than"Raw"End Stone
Basically, Endstone"bricks"are much less durable than raw Endstone.This does not make logical sense. Stone bricks are just as durable as cobblestone and stone, and nether bricks are stronger than netherrack.
Any brick-type material is supposed to be sturdier, not less sturdy than their non-brick counterparts. It's a law of architecture: bricks are one of the most sturdy building materials.To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants. Stone bricks are as sturdy as stone and Prismarine to Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine. Nether Bricks and Bricks (Clay) are stronger than netherrack and clay respectively.
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants. Stone bricks are as sturdy as stone and Prismarine to Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine. Nether Bricks and Bricks (Clay) are stronger than netherrack and clay respectively.
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
T
his is inconsistent with otherblocks' brick variants. Stone bricks are as sturdy as stone andPrismarineto PrismarineBricksand Dark Prismarine. Nether Bricks and Bricks (Clay) arestronger than netherrack and clay respectively.To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone = Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine = Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack < Nether Bricks
- Clay < Bricks
-- End Stone != End Stone Bricks*
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone = Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine = Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack < Nether Bricks
- Clay < Bricks
-- End Stone != End Stone Bricks*
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone = Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine = Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack < Nether Bricks
- Clay < Bricks
-- End Stone != End Stone Bricks
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone = Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine = Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack < Nether Bricks
- Clay < Bricks
-- End Stone != End Stone Bricks
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone = Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine = Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack < Nether Bricks
- Clay < Bricks
-- End Stone != End Stone Bricks
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone = Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine = Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack < Nether Bricks
- Clay < Bricks
-- End Stone != End Stone Bricks
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone = Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine = Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack < Nether Bricks
- Clay < Bricks
...- End Stone != End Stone Bricks
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone <= Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine <= Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack <= Nether Bricks
- Clay <= Bricks
...- End Stone !<= End Stone Bricks
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater in it than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
End Stone Bricksare LessSturdythan End StoneEnd Stone Bricks have Less Hardness and Blast Resistence than End Stone
End Stone BrickshaveLessHardness and Blast ResistencethanEndStoneEnd Stone Bricks are less Durable than End Stone and Destroyed by the Ender Dragon
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone <= Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine <= Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack <= Nether Bricks
- Clay <= Bricks
...- End Stone !<= End Stone Bricks
To fit logistics, the blast resistance and hardness of end stone bricks should be the same or greater than regular End stone, as well as making it indestructible by the Ender Dragon.
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater
in itthan the End Stone.*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone, and the Ender Dragon can destroy it.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone <= Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine <= Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack <= Nether Bricks
- Clay <= Bricks
...- End Stone !<= End Stone Bricks
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone, and the Ender Dragon can destroy it.
This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone <= Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine <= Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack <= Nether Bricks
- Clay <= Bricks
...- End Stone !<= End Stone Bricks
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
As title says, End Stone Bricks are much less durable than raw End Stone, and the Ender Dragon can destroy it.
End Bricks appear to have the same blast resistance and hardness as sandstone.This is inconsistent with other blocks' brick variants:
- Stone <= Stone Bricks (+ its variants)
- Prismarine <= Prismarine Bricks and Dark Prismarine
- Netherrack <= Nether Bricks
- Clay <= Bricks
...- End Stone !<= End Stone Bricks
-
How to Prove:
*Ignite TNT in a thick bed of End Stone, and then ignite another TNT block in a thick bed of End Stone Bricks. The bed with End bricks should have a much bigger crater than the End Stone.
*With mobGriefing set to "true", have an Ender Dragon fly into End Stone Bricks.
When I was messing around with the TPS issue,I found a series duplication bug involving pistons and slime blocks.If a sticky piston extends by a 1-Redstone Tick pulse and pushes slime blocks sticked to adjacent blocks, the sticked blocks aren't converted to moving blocks. Thus, clones of the blocks are created at where the unconverted blocks were supposed to go, resulting in a duplication.
Although, once the sticky piston pulls the slime blocks back after receiving another 1-tick pulse, the cloned blocks are lost (returns to "Before" picture).Anyway, please fix this bug, Mojang. You probably don't want this to be exploited to the extreme. Right?
In Minecraft 1.9, the sounds of opening and closing a chest was changed. This includes both current wooden (normal) chests and trapped chests, but not ender chests.
How to Reproduce
- Open and close an ender chest in any game mode, except Spectator.
In Minecraft 1.9, the sounds of opening and closing a chest was changed. This includes both current wooden (normal) chests and trapped chests, but not ender chests.
//
How to Reproduce
- Open and close an ender chest in any game mode, except Spectator.
In Minecraft 1.9, the sounds of opening and closing a chest was changed. This includes both current wooden (normal) chests and trapped chests, but not ender chests.
//
How to Reproduce
- Open and close an ender chest in any game mode, except Spectator.
In Minecraft 1.9, the sounds of opening and closing a chest was changed. This includes both current wooden (normal) chests and trapped chests, but not ender chests.
How to Reproduce
- Open and close an ender chest in any game mode, except Spectator.
In Minecraft 1.9, the sounds of opening and closing a chest was changed. This includes both current wooden (normal) chests and trapped chests, but not ender chests.
How to Reproduce
- Open and close an ender chest in any game mode, except Spectator.
In Minecraft 1.9, the sounds of opening and closing a chest was changed. This includes both wooden (normal) chests and trapped chests, but not ender chests.
How to Reproduce
- Open and close an ender chest in any game mode, except Spectator.
In Minecraft 1.9, the sounds of opening and closing a chest was changed. This includes both wooden (normal) chests and trapped chests, but
notender chests.
How to Reproduce
- Open and close an ender chest in any game mode, except Spectator.
In Minecraft 1.9, the sounds of opening and closing a chest was changed. This includes both wooden (normal) chests and trapped chests, but not ender chests.
How to Reproduce
- Open and close an ender chest in any game mode, except Spectator.
While Left and Shift-Clicking to craft works fine, zooming out a map by a hotbar hotkey ("1" to "9" by default) doesn't update the map.
The paper in the crafting grid is still consumed.
Exiting and reentering the world doesn't fix the intended zoom-out.
-
How to Reproduce:
1) Open an empty map.
2) In a Crafting Table Grid, place the crafting configuration for a zoomed-out map: a filled map surrounded in 8 paper sheets.
3) Craft and place the output map in a designated empty Hotbar Slot simultaneously by pressing the corresponding hotkey for that slot.
In other words, craft the map by a Hotbar Hotkey.What should happen is that nothing changes for the map.
In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain.
In the screenshots below both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
The left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse,andit took longer toretract than theleft piston.In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston.
In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston. The pulse on the left piston was longer than the right.
In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston.The pulse on the left piston was longer than the right.In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston.
The left-side pulse was longer than the right-side.
In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain, without other blocks.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston.
The left-side pulse was longer than the right-side.
EDIT: This behavior is due to Quasi-Connectivity. This likely "works as intended".
-
In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain, without other blocks.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston.
The left-side pulse was longer than the right-side.
EDIT: This behavior is due to Quasi-Connectivity. This likely "works as intended".
-
In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain, without other blocks.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston.
The left-side pulse was longer than the right-side.EDIT: This behavior is due to Quasi-Connectivity. This is likely "works as intended".
-
In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain, without other blocks.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston.
The left-side pulse was longer than the right-side.
EDIT: This behavior is due to Quasi-Connectivity.
This islikely "works as intended".-
In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain, without other blocks.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston.
The left-side pulse was longer than the right-side.EDIT: This behavior is due to Quasi-Connectivity. It likely "works as intended".
-
In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain, without other blocks.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston.
The left-side pulse was longer than the right-side.
EDIT: This behavior is due to Quasi-Connectivity. It likely "works as intended".
-
In 16w44a, Observers are meant to output a 1-Redstone tick signal (2 game ticks). However, this is not the case in a downward-flowing Observer Chain, without other blocks.
In the screenshots below, both foreground Sticky Pistons should only push or pull the Emerald Blocks with each pulse.
But the left-side piston pushes and pulls with the same pulse and retracts later than the right piston.
The left-side pulse was longer than the right-side.
Let me explain this to you.
Elytra cannot break. But instead, if their durability falls to 0, they can't be used for gliding/flying (their use) anymore until they're repaired at an anvil. With this system, Mojang probably intended to let them be used indefinitely, as long as the player keeps repairing them.
However, as I show in the attached screenshot, they can become "too expensive" to repair after the Elytra were repaired 6 times. Therefore, a pair of Elytra doesn't have an infinite usage which goes against the possible reasoning behind making them not 'break'.
This should be fixed before 1.9 is officially released. Otherwise, the player would have to load new chunks (which makes world files bigger) to find an End Ship for a new pair of Elytra.
Right, RedstoneHelper. Thanks for the clarification.
What do you do once your pair of Elytra become too expensive to repair?
You have to go find a new End Ship for a new pair.
Elytra are technically non-renewable, since there's only so many End Ships in a world which is fine for me. But, they're 'durability' is meant to be "renewable".
You can kill as many cows, horses, and/or rabbits as you need to for the leather to repair them, but you can't do that forever without making your world bigger and taking up more computer storage space. This wouldn't be as issue if you could just repair one pair of Elytra an infinite amount of times, without getting new Elytra. ;l
Yes. To make them more convenient for SMP servers, this shouldn't happen at all.
Jeb tweeted earlier this week that he made renaming items no longer increase their repair cost at anvils. This change effectively fixes this issue. As long as players rename their elytra, they won't have any problems.
Therefore, I call this bug to be "fixed" starting with 15w42a (which should be released tomorrow).
Ok. I'm sorry for my reaction. A lot of other players probably fell for it too.
So, 15w42a was released today, and it looks like that Jeb and Mojang have decided on a new system. The Mending enchantment was introduced. An item with this enchantment will have its durability restored, if needed, as the player collects experience. Exp. goes to the mendable item instead of the player.
Therefore, elytra can be infinitely repaired if it has Mending. However, enchanted books with Mending will only be found in the world, like elytra. Locations haven't been implemented nor confirmed at this time.
That's fine for me. Thank you for replying, Searge!
This bug has been a problem for me too, ever since elytra were first introduced.
Mojang has to fix this before releasing 1.9 complete.
Otherwise, they'll be many deaths by crashing (Overworld/Nether), burning (Nether), or falling (The End)! It's not fair to lose these elytra when it's not your fault!
I went to a normal End Portal from a stronghold in 16w02a and it wouldn't activate when I inserted all the Eye of Ender.
All I can say is: this must be fixed.
Confirmed for release 1.9.1.
Blast resistance doesn't determine if the Ender Dragon will destroy the block. It's based on whitelist, just like for what blocks Endermen can pick up.
The only exception to that rule is Ocean Monuments.
Ok. Didn't see that at first. Thanks.
Perhaps this doesn't need to be fixed then. You could just replace the second to last Observer with an Activator Rail or a Fence Gate, like I did on the right side.
Works as intended?
Updated OP.
Redstone interacts with observers, as if they were an upside down slab or stair block, glowstone, or any other transparent block redstone can be placed on. Redstone cannot flow downward on these blocks, working as a diode.
The observer isn't just detecting the presence of a liquid. It's also detects the change in their level, which is a block state for water and lava.
And taking that away would go against MC-107664, where the Observer is intended to detect any block state changes.
Still present in 1.11 Official Release.
You could rotate the models, for the time being (resource pack).