MC-163153Transparent parts of beacon beam texture appear black
The transparent parts of custom beacon beam textures appear black now, transparency for them worked fine before 19w41a.
Linked Issues
![[Mod] violine1101](../../../data/avatars/users/92858.png){kind=small}
NormalCreated Issue:
Transparent parts of beacon beam texture appears black
The transparent parts of custom beacon beam textures appear black now, transparency for them worked fine before 19w41a.
Attachments1
![[Mod] tryashtar](../../../data/avatars/users/41963.png){kind=small}
relates to
![[Mojang] Adrian Östergård](../../../data/assets/gravatar/nighter.jpeg){kind=small}
ImportantTransparent parts of beacon beam texture appearsblack
![[Mojang] slicedlime](../../../data/assets/gravatar/slicedlime.jpeg){kind=small}
Relates to MC-164001 and MC-163153.
The bug
Cauldrons, water cauldrons, lava cauldrons and powder snow cauldrons render as solid blocks, rather than rendering as "cutout" blocks. This is a problem for two reasons:
- cauldrons did render as "cutout" upon their first implementation
- hoppers, a visually and structurally very similar block, do use cutout rendering
As a result, any transparent pixels which are in a texture that a cauldron block uses will be rendered completely opaque.
How to reproduce
A resource pack is attached to this ticket which replaces the "blockstates" files for cauldrons (including water_cauldron, lava_cauldron and powder_snow_cauldron) and hoppers with the potted fern. Place one of each cauldron type (including empty) and a hopper in close proximity, and apply the resource pack.
Expected results
All of the ferns would appear fern-shaped.
Actual results
The ferns which represent the cauldrons have a solid white rectangle behind them. The hopper correctly does not have this background.
How to fix
All cauldrons should be changed to use the "cutout" render type (with the exception of water cauldrons, which should use the "translucent" render type instead to fix MC-13187).
Same for bell in inventory
No, that's
MC-163001Should we merge this into MC-164001?