End portal doesn't have perspective and depth
I just realised that the end portal doesn't have perspective movement and depth which was in versions prior to the 1.11 snapshots now it looks more like the end gateway.
Linked Issues
is duplicated by5
MC-120103End Portal Block Texture Behaves Strangely DuplicateMC-128629End Portal effect has wrong parallax since 1.11DuplicateMC-234670Render problems on the end portal texture.DuplicateMC-259602Wrong END portal renderDuplicateMC-278402the starfield effect does not changed prespective with respect to the player (just like bedrock and old versions)Duplicate
MCPE-119749
Created Issue:
End portal doesn't have perspective and depth
I just realised that the end portal doesn't have perspective movement and depth which was in versions prior to the 1.11 snapshots now it looks more like the end gateway.
Attachments3
![[Mod] Neko](../../../data/avatars/users/92901.png){kind=small}
relates to
Maria Lemónis duplicated by
is duplicated by
![[Mod] OcelotOnesie](../../../data/avatars/users/43220.png){kind=small}
relates to
![[Mod] Michael Wobst](../../../data/avatars/users/37868.png){kind=small}
is duplicated by
![[Mod] violine1101](../../../data/avatars/users/92858.png){kind=small}
is duplicated by
![[Mod] Asteraoth](../../../data/avatars/users/92886.png){kind=small}
is duplicated by
![[Mod] tryashtar](../../../data/avatars/users/41963.png){kind=small}
I believe this is a duplicate of MC-109473.
Duplicate of MC-109473.
![[Bot] Arisa](../../../data/avatars/users/43007.png){kind=small}
Thank you for your report!
We're tracking this issue in MC-109473, so this ticket is being resolved and linked as a duplicate.
That ticket has already been resolved as working as intended, which means this is not considered a bug and won't be fixed. Please do not leave a comment on the linked ticket.
If you haven't already, you might like to make use of the search feature to see if the issue has already been mentioned.
Quick Links:
📓 Bug Tracker Guidelines – 💬 Community Support – 📧 Mojang Support
📓 Project Summary – ✍️ Feedback and Suggestions – 📖 Game Wiki
– I am a bot. This action was performed automatically! The ticket was resolved by one of our moderators, and I left this message to give more information to you.
Thank you for your report!
We're tracking this issue in MC-109473, so this ticket is being resolved and linked as a duplicate.
That ticket has already been resolved as working as intended, which means this is not considered a bug and won't be fixed. Please do not leave a comment on the linked ticket.
If you haven't already, you might like to make use of the search feature to see if the issue has already been mentioned.
Quick Links:
📓 Bug Tracker Guidelines – 💬 Community Support – 📧 Mojang Support
📓 Project Summary – ✍️ Feedback and Suggestions – 📖 Game Wiki
But it's stil not a valid parity issue tho, End Portal on Java Edition changed to not have perspective and depth on 1.11 (MC-109473) and the bug report only accept parity issue introduced in Buzzy Bees (Bedrock Edition 1.14 / Java Edition 1.15) or later
![[Mod] ManosSef](../../../data/avatars/users/61702.png){kind=small}
Thank you for your report!
We're tracking this issue in MC-109473, so this ticket is being resolved and linked as a duplicate.
That ticket has already been resolved as working as intended, which means this is not considered a bug and won't be fixed. Please do not leave a comment on the linked ticket.
If you haven't already, you might like to make use of the search feature to see if the issue has already been mentioned.
Quick Links:
📓 Bug Tracker Guidelines – 💬 Community Support – 📧 Mojang Support (Technical Issues) – 📧 Microsoft Support (Account Issues)
📓 Project Summary – ✍️ Feedback and Suggestions – 📖 Game Wiki
Confirmed.
1.10.2 ...16w39c: The end portal is bound to the environment
16w40a .. 16w43a The end portal is bound to player's cursor
And?
"Works As Intended" - Where and who said it?
Reopen issue and fix it
or set resulion "we wont fix it"
The end portal block rendering has to be as prior 1.11 and not as "end gateway"
To replace 3d mechanics with 2d and say "works as intended" it means say nothing/
Is there any specialists with 3d-programming in your company?
Or may be it's time to make minecraft 2d-rendering and say "works as intended"?
Read the history or look at the assignee field.
Who is "Maria Lemón"? The God?
Just set resolution "we wont fix it" or "we have no good programmers to do that"
It's intended, and maria is a mojang employee (as you can see by the prefix).
does maria decide by herself what is intented and what is not?
Who must decide this?
serjproch Probably not, but does it matter? This has been confirmed to be working as intended by Mojang.
This is a bug tracker, not a forum. If you want to discuss, please head over to the official Minecraft Subreddit.
Oкеу
Give please url to that mojang article where it has been confirmed
I can't find it
The URL is https://bugs.mojang.com/browse/MC-109473 – this is the official bug tracker for Mojang games; this report has been resolved as working as intended by a Mojang employee, which confirms it.
I agree this is a bad decision to say it "Works as intended"... The effect since 1.11 is very ugly and frustrating (because the image basically follows the cursor) while it was a nice Parallax effect before with depth sensation.
The new FX is like a 2D texture following the cursor... And a 2D texture following the cursor while world does not is very frustrating...
Related Reddit thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Minecraft/comments/59y3nf/til_since_16w40a_end_portals_rendering_has_changed/
Doing a starry sky block as a portal would be very hard to do if it didn't bob along, so this leads me to believe that this works as intended.
DoggoKingTPG
Just try to look to end portal in 1.4.6 version.
it is NOT WORKING "As Intended"
It is BROKEN and ugly
Maybe mojang changed their mind since 2017? (6 years ago)
Reopen please
Reopen issue and fix it
or set resulion "we wont fix it"
Unless you have any grounds for objectively requesting a review that's not just "looks bad", or any grounds that indicate mojang might actually be reconsidering, not just "what if", then this won't get reopened.
Mojang made a clear choice to change it, and resolved this as intended, and have shown no indication to be changing their minds.